Saturday, May 3, 2014

EU bans imports of Alphonso mangoes: Is India’s biosecurity mechanism rigorous enough?

April 29th, 2014sakshiLeave a commentGo to comments

Recent news reports indicate that the European Union (EU) has banned imports of Alphonso mangoes and four vegetables from India due to the presence of harmful pests and a lack of certification before export.  The ban will be effective between May 1, 2014 and December 2015.  It has been suggested that the ban could impact the export of nearly 16 million mangoes from India, the market for which is worth nearly £6 million a year in a country like the United Kingdom. In this context, it may be useful to examine the regulation of agricultural biosecurity in India, particularly with respect to imports and exports of such agricultural produce.

Currently, two laws, the Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914 and the Livestock Importation Act, 1898, regulate the import and export of plants and animals with a view to control pests and diseases.  Under the laws, the authorities ensure that infectious diseases and pests do not cause widespread damage to the environment, crops, agricultural produce and human beings, i.e. the agricultural biosecurity of a country.  Common examples of pests and diseases have been the Banana bunchy top virus which stunts banana plants and stops production of fruit while another is the Avian Influenza, which caused extensive death of poultry and led to human deaths as well.

Under the existing Acts, different government departments and government-approved bodies are responsible for regulating imports and certifying exports to ensure that there are no threats to agricultural biosecurity.  The Department of Agriculture keeps a check on pests and diseases arising from plants and related produce, such as mangoes and vegetables, while the Department of Animal Husbandry monitors diseases relating to animals and meat products.  The Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) certifies exports of different commodities related to plants and animals.  Various government committees have highlighted the ineffectiveness of the existing system due to its piecemeal approach and have recommended an integrated system to handle biosecurity issues.  It has also been suggested that the existing laws have not kept up with developments in agriculture and are inadequate to deal with the emergence of trans-boundary diseases that pose threats to human, animal and plant safety.

The Agricultural Biosecurity Bill, 2013, pending in Parliament seeks to replace these laws and establish a national authority, the Agricultural Biosecurity Authority of India (ABAI), to regulate biosecurity issues related to plants and animals.  ABAI shall be responsible for: (i) regulating the import and export of plants, animals and related products, (ii) implementing quarantine measures in case of the existence of pests, (iii) regulating the inter-state spread of pests and diseases relating to plants and animals, and (iv) undertaking regular surveillance of pests and diseases.  Under the Bill, exports of plants, animals and related products will only be allowed once ABAI has issued a sanitary or phytosanitary certificate in accordance with the destination country’s requirements. The penalty for exporting goods without adequate certification from ABAI is imprisonment upto two years and and a fine of Rs 2 lakh. The proposed ABAI will also meet India’s obligations to promote research and prevent pests and diseases under the International Plant Protection Convention and the Office International des Epizooties. A PRS analysis of various aspects of the Bill can be found here.

The Bill will lapse with the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha.  It remains to be seen how the incoming government in the 16th Lok Sabha will approach biosecurity issues to prevent incidents like the EU ban on imports of Indian fruits and vegetables in the future.

National Socialist Council of Nagaland

The Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) is a Naga nationalist group operating in Northeast India.[2][3] The main aim of the organization is to establish a sovereign state, "Nagalim" [4] unifying all the areas inhabited by the Naga people in Northeast India and Burma.

Formation

The National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) was formed on January 31, 1980 by Isak Chishi Swu, Thuingaleng Muivah and S.S. Khaplang opposing the Shillong Accordsigned by the then Naga National Council (NNC) with the Government of India. Later, misunderstanding surfaced within the outfit leaders over the issue of commencing negotiation dialogue with the Indian Government and on April 30, 1988, the NSCN split into two fractions; the NSCN-K led by S S Khaplang, and the NSCN-IM, led by Isak Chishi Swu and Thuingaleng Muivah. The split triggered spat of violence and factional clash between the factions.

A brief history of Naga insurgency

The word "Naga" denotes a conglomeration of ethnic tribes living on the Himalayan Range in North East India. AngamiAoChakesangKonyak, Pochury, RengmaSumiMaramMao,TangkhulThangalSangtamPoumaiZeliangrongPhomNocteMaring, etc. are some important sub-tribes of Naga. It is not to be confused with the Hindu Naga (Sadhus).

The origin of Naga Struggle is traced back to the founding of the Naga Club, in Kohima in 1918 by a group of educated Nagas. They submitted a memorandum to the Simon Commission to exclude the Nagas from any constitutional framework of India. With the coming of Angami Zapu Phizo, popularly called as Phizo, the Naga Movement gained momentum in the late 1940s.

Phizo along with some other prominent leaders fought on the side of the Indian National Army (of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose) under the Japanese command against the Allied Force with the hope of attaining freedom. The Naga Club later became the Naga National Council (NNC) in 1946, the precursor of the NSCN to voice for Naga freedom. Disappointed by the policy frameworks of the Indian National Congress, they went underground and started engaging in guerrilla warfare against Indian Security Forces.

The NNC under Phizo's leadership declared Independence of Nagaland on the 14th of August 1947. It was greeted with great euphoria which echoed all over the Naga hills. Phizo was arrested in 1948 by the Indian Government on charges of rebellion. On his release, Phizo was made the President of the NNC in 1950. In 1952, he met Jawaharlal Nehru, the then Prime Minister of India to chalk out pathway for Naga's Independence. The meeting was un-successful with both the parties remaining steadfast to their view points and demands.

The Indian army then marched in to suppress the rebellion and to track down Phizo, however, Phizo managed to escape to East Pakistan and from there to London, where he remain exiled till his death in 1990. The armed rebellion continued led by a section of the NNC leaders. An agreement was reached by the Indian Government and the NNC in the year 1975. This came to be known as the Shillong Accord, which some leaders in the NNC called as total betrayal including Isak Chishi Swu, Th Muivah and Khaplang. This led to the formation of the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland or the NSCN in the late 1970s under the leadership of Isak Chishi Swu, Thuingaleng Muivah and Khaplang. It started an underground Naga Federal government having both Civil and Military wings. It again split into two factions in the late 1980s: the NSCN (IM) and the NSCN (Khaplang).

नभरत्न

हिंदुस्तान एयरोनॉटिक्स लिमिटेड (एचएएल) और रक्षा, अनुसंधान एवं विकास संगठन (डीआरडीओ) के संयुक्त उपक्रम से निर्मित डॉर्नियर 228 "नभरत्न" वायुयान गुरुवार को देश को समर्पित हो गया। भव्य समारोह में एचएएल के अधिकारियों ने रक्षामंत्री के वैज्ञानिक सलाहकार अविनाश चंदर को विमान सौंपा।

उच्च तकनीकी से लैस यह विमान हवा, समुद्र व जमीन पर निगरानी के साथ ही खुफिया जानकारी एकत्र करने व बचाव कार्य में सहायक होगा। किसी भी मौसम में काम कर सकने वाले इस वायुयान से सेना के तीनों अंगों को मजबूती मिलेगी।

डीआरडीओ इस वायुयान पर रिसर्च कर अन्य विमानों में भी इस तरह की आधुनिक तकनीकी व रडार का इस्तेमाल करेगा। हिंदुस्तान एयरोनाटिक्स लिमिटेड कानपुर प्रभाग ने डॉर्नियर 228 वायुयान के निर्माण के लिए 29 नवंबर, 1983 को करार पर हस्ताक्षर किए थे। जिसके तहत 150 वायुयान का उत्पादन होना था।

जिसमें 124 वायुयान को अभी तक वायुदूत, एयरफोर्स, कोस्ट गार्ड, नेवी व राष्ट्रीय विमानपत्तन प्राधिकरण को सौंपे जा चुके हें। प्रारूप दो के इस डीओ 228 वायुयान पहले के अन्य विमानों से कहीं अलग है।

- See more at: http://naidunia.jagran.com/national-hal-hands-over-dornier-to-drdo-for-lrdes-exclusive-use-81617#sthash.E5wpYBhr.dpuf