Wednesday, May 28, 2014

कर चोरी और गैर-कानूनी गतिविधियों के जरिए विदेश में जमा की गई भारी धन राशि की जांच

माननीय उच्‍च्‍तम न्‍यायालय के निर्णय के अनुपालन में विशेष जांच दल का गठन 

केन्‍द्रीय मंत्रिमंडल ने माननीय उच्‍च्‍तम न्‍यायालय के निर्णय का अनुपालन करते हुए एक विशेष जांच दल यानी एसआईटी का गठन किया है ताकि कर चोरी और गैर-कानूनी गतिविधियों के जरिए विदेश में जमा की गई भारी धन राशि की जांच की जा सके।

 

 

एसआईटी के अध्‍यक्ष उच्‍चतम न्‍यायालय के पूर्व न्‍यायाधीश माननीय न्‍यायमूर्ति श्री एम. बी. शाह और उपाध्‍यक्ष पूर्व न्‍यायाधीश माननीय न्‍यायमूर्ति श्री अरिजित पसायत होंगे। 

इस उच्‍च स्‍तरीय समिति के सदस्‍य निम्‍नांकित अनुसार होंगे : -

 

i.          सचिव, राजस्‍व विभाग

 

ii.         डिप्‍टी गवर्नर, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक,

 

iii.        निदेशक (आईबी),

 

iv.        निदेशक, प्रवर्तन निदेशालय

 

v.         निदेशक, सीबीआई

 

vi.        अध्‍यक्ष, सीबीडीटी,

 

vii.       महा निदेशक, स्‍वापक नियंत्रण ब्‍यूरो

 

viii.      महा निदेशक, राजस्‍व गुप्‍तचर

 

ix.        निदेशक, वित्‍तीय गुप्‍तचर यूनिट

x.         निदेशक, अनुसंधान एवं विश्‍लेषण विंग और

 

xi.        संयुक्‍त संचिव (एफटी एंड आईआर-1), सीबीडीटी

 

एसआईटी को बिना हिसाब किताब यानी अवैध धन संग्रह से संबंधित हसन अली और अन्‍य मामलों की जांच और मुकद्दमें चलाने का काम सौंपा गया है। एसआईटी ऐसे मामलों के बारे में एक व्‍यापक कार्ययोजना तैयार करेगा और अपने काम-काज की जानकारी समय-समय पर अदालत को देगा। 

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Model Code of Conduct and the 2014 General Elections

April 14th, 2014JoyitaLeave a commentGo to comments

Recently, the Election Commission has recommended postponing certain policy decisions of the government related to natural gas pricing, and notifying ecologically sensitive areas in the Western Ghats, by invoking the Model Code of Conduct (MCC).  It has also censured severalcandidates for violating the MCC.  In light of these recent events, we outline the key features of the MCC below.

What is the Model Code of Conduct and who does it apply to?

The MCC is a set of guidelines issued by the Election Commission to regulate political parties and candidates prior to elections, to ensure free and fair elections. This is in keeping with Article 324 of the Constitution, which gives the Election Commission the power to supervise elections to the Parliament and state legislatures.

The MCC is operational from the date that the election schedule is announced till the date that results are announced.  Thus, for the general elections this year, the MCC came into force on March 5, 2014, when the election schedule was announced, and will operate till May 16, 2014, when the final results will be announced.

How has the Model Code of Conduct evolved over time?

According to the Press Information Bureau, a form of the MCC was first introduced in the state assembly elections in Kerala in 1960.  It was a set of instructions to political parties regarding election meetings, speeches, slogans, etc.

In the 1962 general elections to the Lok Sabha, the MCC was circulated to recognised parties, and state governments sought feedback from the parties.  The MCC was largely followed by all parties in the 1962 elections and continued to be followed in subsequent general elections.

In 1979, the Election Commission added a section to regulate the ‘party in power’ and prevent it from gaining an unfair advantage at the time of elections.  In 2013, the Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to include guidelines regarding election manifestos, which it has included in the MCC for the 2014 general elections.

What are the key provisions of the Model Code of Conduct?

The MCC contains eight provisions dealing with general conduct, meetings, processions, polling day, polling booths, observers, party in power, and election manifestos.  Major provisions of the MCC are outlined below.

General Conduct:  Criticism of political parties must be limited to their policies and programmes, past record and work.  Activities such as:  (a) using caste and communal feelings to secure votes,  (b) criticising candidates on the basis of unverified reports,  (c) bribing or intimidation of voters, and (d) organising demonstrations or picketing outside houses of persons to protest against their opinions, are prohibited.Meetings:  Parties must inform the local police authorities of the venue and time of any meeting in time to enable the police to make adequate security arrangements.Processions:  If two or more candidates plan processions along the same route, organisers must establish contact in advance to ensure that the processions do not clash.  Carrying and burning effigies representing members of other political parties is not allowed.Polling day:  All authorised party workers at polling booths should be given identity badges.  These should not contain the party name, symbol or name of the candidate.Polling booths:  Only voters, and those with a valid pass from the Election Commission, will be allowed to enter polling booths.Observers:  The Election Commission will appoint observers to whom any candidates may report problems regarding the conduct of the election.Party in power:  The MCC incorporated certain restrictions in 1979, regulating the conduct of the party in power.  Ministers must not combine official visits with election work or use official machinery for the same.  The party must avoid advertising at the cost of the public exchequer or using official mass media for publicity on achievements to improve chances of victory in the elections.  Ministers and other authorities must not announce any financial grants, or promise any construction of roads, provision of drinking water, etc.   Other parties must be allowed to use public spaces and rest houses and these must not be monopolised by the party in power.Election manifestos:  Added in 2013, these guidelines prohibit parties from making promises that exert an undue influence on voters, and suggest that manifestos also indicate the means to achieve promises.

Is the Model Code of Conduct legally binding?

The MCC is not enforceable by law.  However, certain provisions of the MCC may be enforced through invoking corresponding provisions in other statutes such as the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The Election Commission has argued against making the MCC legally binding; stating that elections must be completed within a relatively short time (close to 45 days),  and judicial proceedings typically take longer, therefore it is not feasible to make it enforceable by law.

On the other hand, in 2013, the Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice, recommended making the MCC legally binding.  In a report on electoral reforms, the Standing Committee observed that most provisions of the MCC are already enforceable through corresponding provisions in other statutes, mentioned above.  It recommended that the MCC be made a part of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

EU bans imports of Alphonso mangoes: Is India’s biosecurity mechanism rigorous enough?

April 29th, 2014sakshiLeave a commentGo to comments

Recent news reports indicate that the European Union (EU) has banned imports of Alphonso mangoes and four vegetables from India due to the presence of harmful pests and a lack of certification before export.  The ban will be effective between May 1, 2014 and December 2015.  It has been suggested that the ban could impact the export of nearly 16 million mangoes from India, the market for which is worth nearly £6 million a year in a country like the United Kingdom. In this context, it may be useful to examine the regulation of agricultural biosecurity in India, particularly with respect to imports and exports of such agricultural produce.

Currently, two laws, the Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914 and the Livestock Importation Act, 1898, regulate the import and export of plants and animals with a view to control pests and diseases.  Under the laws, the authorities ensure that infectious diseases and pests do not cause widespread damage to the environment, crops, agricultural produce and human beings, i.e. the agricultural biosecurity of a country.  Common examples of pests and diseases have been the Banana bunchy top virus which stunts banana plants and stops production of fruit while another is the Avian Influenza, which caused extensive death of poultry and led to human deaths as well.

Under the existing Acts, different government departments and government-approved bodies are responsible for regulating imports and certifying exports to ensure that there are no threats to agricultural biosecurity.  The Department of Agriculture keeps a check on pests and diseases arising from plants and related produce, such as mangoes and vegetables, while the Department of Animal Husbandry monitors diseases relating to animals and meat products.  The Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) certifies exports of different commodities related to plants and animals.  Various government committees have highlighted the ineffectiveness of the existing system due to its piecemeal approach and have recommended an integrated system to handle biosecurity issues.  It has also been suggested that the existing laws have not kept up with developments in agriculture and are inadequate to deal with the emergence of trans-boundary diseases that pose threats to human, animal and plant safety.

The Agricultural Biosecurity Bill, 2013, pending in Parliament seeks to replace these laws and establish a national authority, the Agricultural Biosecurity Authority of India (ABAI), to regulate biosecurity issues related to plants and animals.  ABAI shall be responsible for: (i) regulating the import and export of plants, animals and related products, (ii) implementing quarantine measures in case of the existence of pests, (iii) regulating the inter-state spread of pests and diseases relating to plants and animals, and (iv) undertaking regular surveillance of pests and diseases.  Under the Bill, exports of plants, animals and related products will only be allowed once ABAI has issued a sanitary or phytosanitary certificate in accordance with the destination country’s requirements. The penalty for exporting goods without adequate certification from ABAI is imprisonment upto two years and and a fine of Rs 2 lakh. The proposed ABAI will also meet India’s obligations to promote research and prevent pests and diseases under the International Plant Protection Convention and the Office International des Epizooties. A PRS analysis of various aspects of the Bill can be found here.

The Bill will lapse with the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha.  It remains to be seen how the incoming government in the 16th Lok Sabha will approach biosecurity issues to prevent incidents like the EU ban on imports of Indian fruits and vegetables in the future.

National Socialist Council of Nagaland

The Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) is a Naga nationalist group operating in Northeast India.[2][3] The main aim of the organization is to establish a sovereign state, "Nagalim" [4] unifying all the areas inhabited by the Naga people in Northeast India and Burma.

Formation

The National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) was formed on January 31, 1980 by Isak Chishi Swu, Thuingaleng Muivah and S.S. Khaplang opposing the Shillong Accordsigned by the then Naga National Council (NNC) with the Government of India. Later, misunderstanding surfaced within the outfit leaders over the issue of commencing negotiation dialogue with the Indian Government and on April 30, 1988, the NSCN split into two fractions; the NSCN-K led by S S Khaplang, and the NSCN-IM, led by Isak Chishi Swu and Thuingaleng Muivah. The split triggered spat of violence and factional clash between the factions.

A brief history of Naga insurgency

The word "Naga" denotes a conglomeration of ethnic tribes living on the Himalayan Range in North East India. AngamiAoChakesangKonyak, Pochury, RengmaSumiMaramMao,TangkhulThangalSangtamPoumaiZeliangrongPhomNocteMaring, etc. are some important sub-tribes of Naga. It is not to be confused with the Hindu Naga (Sadhus).

The origin of Naga Struggle is traced back to the founding of the Naga Club, in Kohima in 1918 by a group of educated Nagas. They submitted a memorandum to the Simon Commission to exclude the Nagas from any constitutional framework of India. With the coming of Angami Zapu Phizo, popularly called as Phizo, the Naga Movement gained momentum in the late 1940s.

Phizo along with some other prominent leaders fought on the side of the Indian National Army (of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose) under the Japanese command against the Allied Force with the hope of attaining freedom. The Naga Club later became the Naga National Council (NNC) in 1946, the precursor of the NSCN to voice for Naga freedom. Disappointed by the policy frameworks of the Indian National Congress, they went underground and started engaging in guerrilla warfare against Indian Security Forces.

The NNC under Phizo's leadership declared Independence of Nagaland on the 14th of August 1947. It was greeted with great euphoria which echoed all over the Naga hills. Phizo was arrested in 1948 by the Indian Government on charges of rebellion. On his release, Phizo was made the President of the NNC in 1950. In 1952, he met Jawaharlal Nehru, the then Prime Minister of India to chalk out pathway for Naga's Independence. The meeting was un-successful with both the parties remaining steadfast to their view points and demands.

The Indian army then marched in to suppress the rebellion and to track down Phizo, however, Phizo managed to escape to East Pakistan and from there to London, where he remain exiled till his death in 1990. The armed rebellion continued led by a section of the NNC leaders. An agreement was reached by the Indian Government and the NNC in the year 1975. This came to be known as the Shillong Accord, which some leaders in the NNC called as total betrayal including Isak Chishi Swu, Th Muivah and Khaplang. This led to the formation of the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland or the NSCN in the late 1970s under the leadership of Isak Chishi Swu, Thuingaleng Muivah and Khaplang. It started an underground Naga Federal government having both Civil and Military wings. It again split into two factions in the late 1980s: the NSCN (IM) and the NSCN (Khaplang).

नभरत्न

हिंदुस्तान एयरोनॉटिक्स लिमिटेड (एचएएल) और रक्षा, अनुसंधान एवं विकास संगठन (डीआरडीओ) के संयुक्त उपक्रम से निर्मित डॉर्नियर 228 "नभरत्न" वायुयान गुरुवार को देश को समर्पित हो गया। भव्य समारोह में एचएएल के अधिकारियों ने रक्षामंत्री के वैज्ञानिक सलाहकार अविनाश चंदर को विमान सौंपा।

उच्च तकनीकी से लैस यह विमान हवा, समुद्र व जमीन पर निगरानी के साथ ही खुफिया जानकारी एकत्र करने व बचाव कार्य में सहायक होगा। किसी भी मौसम में काम कर सकने वाले इस वायुयान से सेना के तीनों अंगों को मजबूती मिलेगी।

डीआरडीओ इस वायुयान पर रिसर्च कर अन्य विमानों में भी इस तरह की आधुनिक तकनीकी व रडार का इस्तेमाल करेगा। हिंदुस्तान एयरोनाटिक्स लिमिटेड कानपुर प्रभाग ने डॉर्नियर 228 वायुयान के निर्माण के लिए 29 नवंबर, 1983 को करार पर हस्ताक्षर किए थे। जिसके तहत 150 वायुयान का उत्पादन होना था।

जिसमें 124 वायुयान को अभी तक वायुदूत, एयरफोर्स, कोस्ट गार्ड, नेवी व राष्ट्रीय विमानपत्तन प्राधिकरण को सौंपे जा चुके हें। प्रारूप दो के इस डीओ 228 वायुयान पहले के अन्य विमानों से कहीं अलग है।

- See more at: http://naidunia.jagran.com/national-hal-hands-over-dornier-to-drdo-for-lrdes-exclusive-use-81617#sthash.E5wpYBhr.dpuf